Well, I did answer this, but the message hasn't shown up yet. Here 
it is again:

Yes you will have to remove them once Fidelity sends them out.
 
For equities, the exchange is responsible for tracking all corporate 
actions, do they all have a compliance department that tracks them 
closely and send them out on their data feeds. That's why stock 
dividend announcements are almost always on time.
 
Mutual funds have no requirement to release this information to 
anyone other than their clients, so they can do as they please.
 
 
Best regards,
 
Gary
 




--- In [email protected], Keith McCombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Someone -- Please answer Dave's question below, "Do you
> have to manually remove your correction at that time to avoid 
doubling
> the distribution?"
> 
> D. Christensen wrote:
> >
> > Harry,
> >
> > I have been reluctant to use the Mutual Fund Editor to manually 
make
> > corrections because I was concerned about a second potential 
error when
> > the distribution actually appears in the QP downloaded data. Do 
you
> > have to manually remove your correction at that time to avoid 
doubling
> > the distribution?
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > Harry M. Ward wrote:
> > > On 15 Dec 2006 08:37:39 -0000, "investor0329" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > <mailto:mb0329%40msn.com>
> > > investor0329 wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>> By the way..the Fidelity select data is still wrong. I 
realize that
> > >>> it is not QPs fault..but a model I spent a lot of time 
putting
> > >>> together is totally worthless until the data is corrected.
> > >>>
> > >
> > > Fidelity is not very good at releasing their distribution 
information
> > > to data services. And sometimes what gets released is only 
PART of the
> > > distribution, which can delude you. I agree that it is 
frustrating
> > > with models you have created to track them.
> > >
> > > Use QP's Mutual Fund Editor to manually correct for the 
distribution
> > > errors. That is what I do every year.
> > >
> > > Harry
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >  
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to