Thanks Gary. Don't think I don't appreciate your efforts. I know how hard it is making sure data is correct.
--- In [email protected], "gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I looked in to that, and sent the correction out last night, it looks like a job didn't run here, as we got the information in the data feed. > > I wouldn't assume anything, I'm verifying all of the dividend information, and will make sure that it's as good as possible. > > The goal is to have historical dividends for stocks, and provide total return prices for everything, that requires accurate dividends. > > Best regards, > > Gary > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: investor0329 > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 11:10 PM > Subject: [quotes-plus] abr Re: Complaints, complaints and more complaints > > > Hello Gary, > ABR is an equity..so why isn't its last 58 cent dividend updated in > QP? I mentioned this some days back. Yahoo has the update. The last > payout was over a month ago and it is not in QP? Can I assume there > are many like this? Thx. > > --- In [email protected], "garylyb" <gary@> wrote: > > > > Well, I did answer this, but the message hasn't shown up yet. Here > > it is again: > > > > Yes you will have to remove them once Fidelity sends them out. > > > > For equities, the exchange is responsible for tracking all > corporate > > actions, do they all have a compliance department that tracks them > > closely and send them out on their data feeds. That's why stock > > dividend announcements are almost always on time. > > > > Mutual funds have no requirement to release this information to > > anyone other than their clients, so they can do as they please. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Keith McCombs <kmccombs@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Someone -- Please answer Dave's question below, "Do you > > > have to manually remove your correction at that time to avoid > > doubling > > > the distribution?" > > > > > > D. Christensen wrote: > > > > > > > > Harry, > > > > > > > > I have been reluctant to use the Mutual Fund Editor to > manually > > make > > > > corrections because I was concerned about a second potential > > error when > > > > the distribution actually appears in the QP downloaded data. > Do > > you > > > > have to manually remove your correction at that time to avoid > > doubling > > > > the distribution? > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > Harry M. Ward wrote: > > > > > On 15 Dec 2006 08:37:39 -0000, "investor0329" mb0329@ > > > > <mailto:mb0329%40msn.com> > > > > > investor0329 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> By the way..the Fidelity select data is still wrong. I > > realize that > > > > >>> it is not QPs fault..but a model I spent a lot of time > > putting > > > > >>> together is totally worthless until the data is corrected. > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Fidelity is not very good at releasing their distribution > > information > > > > > to data services. And sometimes what gets released is only > > PART of the > > > > > distribution, which can delude you. I agree that it is > > frustrating > > > > > with models you have created to track them. > > > > > > > > > > Use QP's Mutual Fund Editor to manually correct for the > > distribution > > > > > errors. That is what I do every year. > > > > > > > > > > Harry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
