I looked in to that, and sent the correction out last night, it looks like a job didn't run here, as we got the information in the data feed.
I wouldn't assume anything, I'm verifying all of the dividend information, and will make sure that it's as good as possible. The goal is to have historical dividends for stocks, and provide total return prices for everything, that requires accurate dividends. Best regards, Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: investor0329 To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 11:10 PM Subject: [quotes-plus] abr Re: Complaints, complaints and more complaints Hello Gary, ABR is an equity..so why isn't its last 58 cent dividend updated in QP? I mentioned this some days back. Yahoo has the update. The last payout was over a month ago and it is not in QP? Can I assume there are many like this? Thx. --- In [email protected], "garylyb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, I did answer this, but the message hasn't shown up yet. Here > it is again: > > Yes you will have to remove them once Fidelity sends them out. > > For equities, the exchange is responsible for tracking all corporate > actions, do they all have a compliance department that tracks them > closely and send them out on their data feeds. That's why stock > dividend announcements are almost always on time. > > Mutual funds have no requirement to release this information to > anyone other than their clients, so they can do as they please. > > > Best regards, > > Gary > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Keith McCombs <kmccombs@> > wrote: > > > > Someone -- Please answer Dave's question below, "Do you > > have to manually remove your correction at that time to avoid > doubling > > the distribution?" > > > > D. Christensen wrote: > > > > > > Harry, > > > > > > I have been reluctant to use the Mutual Fund Editor to manually > make > > > corrections because I was concerned about a second potential > error when > > > the distribution actually appears in the QP downloaded data. Do > you > > > have to manually remove your correction at that time to avoid > doubling > > > the distribution? > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > Harry M. Ward wrote: > > > > On 15 Dec 2006 08:37:39 -0000, "investor0329" mb0329@ > > > <mailto:mb0329%40msn.com> > > > > investor0329 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> By the way..the Fidelity select data is still wrong. I > realize that > > > >>> it is not QPs fault..but a model I spent a lot of time > putting > > > >>> together is totally worthless until the data is corrected. > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Fidelity is not very good at releasing their distribution > information > > > > to data services. And sometimes what gets released is only > PART of the > > > > distribution, which can delude you. I agree that it is > frustrating > > > > with models you have created to track them. > > > > > > > > Use QP's Mutual Fund Editor to manually correct for the > distribution > > > > errors. That is what I do every year. > > > > > > > > Harry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
