On Nov 21, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: > we disagree is that I think data analysts with limited statistical > backgrounds should consult with local statisticians instead of trying > to muddle through on their own thru lists like this. This is not meant
I think that people lacking reading skills should not be subscribed in lists like this one, bullying and creating confusion around. I will asks as many times as I want/need and the way I use lists if none of your f. b. > to be arrogance on my part -- though it may seem to come across that > way -- but rather a plea for good science. I believe that bad > statistics --> bad science, a problem that I see as pervasive and > inimical to scientific progress, especially in today's data saturated > world. > But enough of my off topic B.S. Please reply privately to not waste > yet more space here (positively or negatively -- stone throwers need > to catch them, too). > You are actually full of your off topic prime matter, you arrogant prick. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
