This sort of post seems to me to be completely unacceptable.
Is there a mechanism by which the list manager can unsubscribe
Mr. Azua and keep him unsubscribed until he learns some manners?
cheers,
Rolf Turner
On 22/11/11 10:28, Giovanni Azua wrote:
On Nov 21, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
we disagree is that I think data analysts with limited statistical
backgrounds should consult with local statisticians instead of trying
to muddle through on their own thru lists like this. This is not meant
I think that people lacking reading skills should not be subscribed in lists
like this one, bullying and creating confusion around.
I will asks as many times as I want/need and the way I use lists if none of
your f. b.
to be arrogance on my part -- though it may seem to come across that
way -- but rather a plea for good science. I believe that bad
statistics --> bad science, a problem that I see as pervasive and
inimical to scientific progress, especially in today's data saturated
world.
But enough of my off topic B.S. Please reply privately to not waste
yet more space here (positively or negatively -- stone throwers need
to catch them, too).
You are actually full of your off topic prime matter, you arrogant prick.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
