thanks,
but I thought Notes will also cause rejection when submitting a package to CRAN. Won´t that be a problem? My package isn´t new, so it will most likely only be checked by CRAN´s automatic system. ________________________________ Von: Ivan Krylov <krylov.r...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Montag, 20. März 2023 12:55:58 An: Ruff, Sergej Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org Betreff: Re: [R-pkg-devel] How to declare Bioconductor Dependencies in the Description File of my R Package В Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:38:41 +0000 "Ruff, Sergej" <sergej.r...@tiho-hannover.de> пишет: > When Limma is üre-installed, I get the following Note: > > > "Package suggested but not available for checking: 'limma'". > > > Seems like the functions isnt installing limma. > > Is there something I am missing? No, this is exactly how it's supposed to behave under R CMD check. The CRAN policy forbids packages to install other packages ("Packages should not write in the user’s home filespace <...> nor anywhere else on the file system") except when the user gives permission to do so ("Limited exceptions may be allowed in interactive sessions if the package obtains confirmation from the user"). Under R CMD check, interactive() is FALSE because there is no user to ask permission from, so the function correctly decides not to install the package. The resulting NOTE is the expected result here. The important part is that your example doesn't crash because it's unable to load the limma namespace. -- Best regards, Ivan [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel