Hello all, I was looking for advice on best practices for resubmitting packages that were archived.
This morning, Brian Ripley erroneously archived one of my packages (geomander) prior to the deadline to fix a broken example. He then archived its reverse dependencies a few minutes later. Given that CRAN is closing for the winter soon, I would like to fix this issue quickly. I have already resubmitted geomander this morning, as I had originally planned. However, as the packages are archived, each now must undergo a manual review, which takes more time. Is it acceptable to submit the other downstream packages while the first is awaiting manual checks, as long as they are submitted in order of the dependency tree? As the original package had only a broken example and the reverse dependencies were actively passing checks, the review should be simple. I would appreciate any advice or wisdom on how to reupload them expeditiously. Best, Chris christophertkenny.com - [email protected] Christopher T. Kenny, PhD Postdoctoral Research Associate, Data-Driven Social Science, Princeton University ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
