I can put up an R-Spec page on Facebook, if there's no objection.

It only takes a few minutes and we can easily post announcements,
events, videos, pictures, link to our website, etc.


On Feb 4, 10:01 am, Jonathan Sherwood <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I had been wondering about R-SPEC on Facebook. I don't know enough about it,
> other than that it's a good way for people to keep abreast of what we're up
> to.
> But I think Pat's right - we need to promote individual meetings to some
> degree. The D&C would run it in their calendar, and we can make sure other
> places such as Writers and Books have it posted.
>
> --
> Jonathan Sherwood
> Sr. Science & Technology Press Officer
> University of Rochester
> 585-273-4726
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Pat Rapp <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Or, perhaps more fitting to this group in particular -- as the atheist
> > otters on South Park say, "For science's sake."
> > : )
>
> > All kidding aside, I agree that it's unfortunate that there was such a low
> > turnout when we had a guest speaker of such high caliber.
>
> > Having said that, there are times when one just cannot get to a meeting.
> > Work and school are priorities. What we should do next time is try a little
> > harder to promote the event -- submitting to the newspaper, blogging it,
> > facebooking it, etc. That way, even if the regular R-Spec crowd is unable
> > to
> > attend, maybe the wider general public would show up.
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dave Henn" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 9:00 AM
> > Subject: Re: DNA in action!
>
> > I'm sorry I couldn't be there, too. That's a lot of "I'm sorry I
> > couldn't be there" posts. Of course, in my case, living 350 miles away
> > during the week makes attendance a tad more difficult even if one
> > doesn't have, er, scheduling conflicts. Had I been in town, and
> > assuming I had functioning transportation, I probably could have found
> > a way to juggle my time to squeeze in an hour or two at the talk. This
> > probably not too subtle hint is not directed at any one person but is
> > prompted by the cumulative weight of apologies for not being there.
> > It's once a month, for God's sake (or, for the agnostics and atheists,
> > goodness' sake, or, for the evil, for badness' sake, or, for the
> > neutral, for whatever's sake, etc.). Same bat time, same bat channel
> > next month.
>
> > Dave
>
> > P.S. We don't own a dog house, but I should probably build a nice one
> > so when I come back to Rochester I can be comfortable. :-P
>
> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Jonathan Sherwood
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Yet another "sorry I couldn't be there" note (at least I have only two
> > > more
> > > months of Tuesday night classes!)
> > > That video was stunning. I've forwarded it to half a dozen biologists.
>
> > > --
> > > Jonathan Sherwood
> > > Sr. Science & Technology Press Officer
> > > University of Rochester
> > > 585-273-4726
>
> > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Eric Scoles <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > >> Yes, thanks from me, too -- I really wanted to be there, I'm sorry I had
> > >> to leave. Maybe we can get a panel together sometime, and promote it
> > more
> > >> heavily. Nancy and Mark for a start. Any other gene-iacal suggesticons?
> > >> Get
> > >> some real speculative juju moving. Other than Alicia (would it be
> > awkward
> > >> being on a panel with your manager?), do we have any biologists?
>
> > >> On 2009-02-04, Pat Rapp <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >>> Thank you for the summary, Nancy. I am so disappointed that I had to
> > >>> miss
> > >>> it!
>
> > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>> From: [email protected]
> > >>> To: [email protected]
> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 6:58 AM
> > >>> Subject: Re: DNA in action!
>
> > >>> Last night's R-Spec meeting was fascinating -- it was too bad that only
> > >>> seven people could make it.  Mark Zahn, Alicia's boss, spoke about
> > >>> Biodefense.  He slanted his talk toward practical knowledge for SF
> > >>> writers
> > >>> who want to include weaponized genemods in their stories, and he did a
> > >>> wonderful job.
>
> > >>> He talked about which pathogens best lend themselves to modification
> > >>> (Ebola, for instance, has a very small genome and produces only eight
> > >>> proteins, which means there's just not room enough in the cell to fit a
> > >>> lot
> > >>> of extra, genetically engineered stuff.)  Mark covered the assembly of
> > >>> viruses using sequencing data and "off-the-shelf" sections of DNA.  He
> > >>> talked about the origins and spread of epidemics.  I hadn't known that
> > >>> the
> > >>> natural host for influenza was an Asian species of duck, and that the
> > >>> way
> > >>> vaccine makers guess at which strains of flu will hit in a given winter
> > >>> is
> > >>> by examining ducks in late summer.
>
> > >>> The talk also covered what you need for a rogue genemod lab to
> > weaponize
> > >>> pathogens: off-the-rack equipment, experienced talent, and no more than
> > >>> a
> > >>> few million dollars.  What the Russians may or may not have been doing
> > >>> in
> > >>> this regard was discussed, including a recommendation for Ken Alibek's
> > >>> scary
> > >>> book BIOHAZARD (which I have read -- it's horrifying).  Mark finished
> > >>> with
> > >>> an overview of surveillance techniques used to spot and track epidemics
> > >>> so
> > >>> that appropriate measures can be taken, including quarantine if
> > >>> necessary.
>
> > >>> Thank you, Alicia.  It was terrific.
>
> > >>> _________________________- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to