Oops - that was the wrong link. Sorry.
*blush*

Here's the right one:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?sid=3c30aaab1e07aca4b8f53c8237d651b7&gid=35268132830

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Pat Rapp
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: DNA in action!


Who's the technology officer? I was just offering to do it because it's a 
good idea, it's easy exposure, and it's free. If someone else wants to do 
it, I say go for it.

An example:
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=646157164&ref=profile#/group.php?gid=35268132830

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Alicia Henn
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: DNA in action!


One of the things we've talked about doing is expanding our online presence 
beyond our website. There has been resistance to a Second Life R-SPEC 
presence. We should hear from our technology officer before launching a 
Facebook page.


How do facebook pages for organizations work? I've never seen one.


Alicia

On Feb 4, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Jonathan Sherwood wrote:


  I'll pitch in my yes vote.


  Can we set it up to allow certain people to post? Obviously, we don't want 
anyone in the world posting updates, but I don't think we'd want just one 
person with access, either.

  --
  Jonathan Sherwood
  Sr. Science & Technology Press Officer
  University of Rochester
  585-273-4726



  On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:


    I can put up an R-Spec page on Facebook, if there's no objection.

    It only takes a few minutes and we can easily post announcements,
    events, videos, pictures, link to our website, etc.


    On Feb 4, 10:01 am, Jonathan Sherwood <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    > I had been wondering about R-SPEC on Facebook. I don't know enough 
about it,
    > other than that it's a good way for people to keep abreast of what 
we're up
    > to.
    > But I think Pat's right - we need to promote individual meetings to 
some
    > degree. The D&C would run it in their calendar, and we can make sure 
other
    > places such as Writers and Books have it posted.
    >
    > --
    > Jonathan Sherwood
    > Sr. Science & Technology Press Officer
    > University of Rochester
    > 585-273-4726
    >
    >
    >

    > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Pat Rapp <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    >
    > > Or, perhaps more fitting to this group in particular -- as the 
atheist
    > > otters on South Park say, "For science's sake."
    > > : )
    >
    > > All kidding aside, I agree that it's unfortunate that there was such 
a low
    > > turnout when we had a guest speaker of such high caliber.
    >
    > > Having said that, there are times when one just cannot get to a 
meeting.
    > > Work and school are priorities. What we should do next time is try a 
little
    > > harder to promote the event -- submitting to the newspaper, blogging 
it,
    > > facebooking it, etc. That way, even if the regular R-Spec crowd is 
unable
    > > to
    > > attend, maybe the wider general public would show up.
    >
    > > ----- Original Message -----

    > > From: "Dave Henn" <[email protected]>
    > > To: <[email protected]>
    > > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 9:00 AM
    > > Subject: Re: DNA in action!
    >
    > > I'm sorry I couldn't be there, too. That's a lot of "I'm sorry I
    > > couldn't be there" posts. Of course, in my case, living 350 miles 
away
    > > during the week makes attendance a tad more difficult even if one
    > > doesn't have, er, scheduling conflicts. Had I been in town, and
    > > assuming I had functioning transportation, I probably could have 
found
    > > a way to juggle my time to squeeze in an hour or two at the talk. 
This
    > > probably not too subtle hint is not directed at any one person but 
is
    > > prompted by the cumulative weight of apologies for not being there.
    > > It's once a month, for God's sake (or, for the agnostics and 
atheists,
    > > goodness' sake, or, for the evil, for badness' sake, or, for the
    > > neutral, for whatever's sake, etc.). Same bat time, same bat channel
    > > next month.
    >
    > > Dave
    >
    > > P.S. We don't own a dog house, but I should probably build a nice 
one
    > > so when I come back to Rochester I can be comfortable. :-P
    >
    > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Jonathan Sherwood

    > > <[email protected]> wrote:
    > > > Yet another "sorry I couldn't be there" note (at least I have only 
two
    > > > more
    > > > months of Tuesday night classes!)
    > > > That video was stunning. I've forwarded it to half a dozen 
biologists.
    >
    > > > --
    > > > Jonathan Sherwood
    > > > Sr. Science & Technology Press Officer
    > > > University of Rochester
    > > > 585-273-4726
    >

    > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Eric Scoles <[email protected]>

    > > wrote:
    >
    > > >> Yes, thanks from me, too -- I really wanted to be there, I'm 
sorry I had
    > > >> to leave. Maybe we can get a panel together sometime, and promote 
it
    > > more
    > > >> heavily. Nancy and Mark for a start. Any other gene-iacal 
suggesticons?
    > > >> Get
    > > >> some real speculative juju moving. Other than Alicia (would it be
    > > awkward
    > > >> being on a panel with your manager?), do we have any biologists?
    >

    > > >> On 2009-02-04, Pat Rapp <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > >>> Thank you for the summary, Nancy. I am so disappointed that I 
had to
    > > >>> miss
    > > >>> it!
    >
    > > >>> ----- Original Message -----

    > > >>> From: [email protected]
    > > >>> To: [email protected]
    > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 6:58 AM
    > > >>> Subject: Re: DNA in action!
    >
    > > >>> Last night's R-Spec meeting was fascinating -- it was too bad 
that only
    > > >>> seven people could make it.  Mark Zahn, Alicia's boss, spoke 
about
    > > >>> Biodefense.  He slanted his talk toward practical knowledge for 
SF
    > > >>> writers
    > > >>> who want to include weaponized genemods in their stories, and he 
did a
    > > >>> wonderful job.
    >
    > > >>> He talked about which pathogens best lend themselves to 
modification
    > > >>> (Ebola, for instance, has a very small genome and produces only 
eight
    > > >>> proteins, which means there's just not room enough in the cell 
to fit a
    > > >>> lot
    > > >>> of extra, genetically engineered stuff.)  Mark covered the 
assembly of
    > > >>> viruses using sequencing data and "off-the-shelf" sections of 
DNA.  He
    > > >>> talked about the origins and spread of epidemics.  I hadn't 
known that
    > > >>> the
    > > >>> natural host for influenza was an Asian species of duck, and 
that the
    > > >>> way
    > > >>> vaccine makers guess at which strains of flu will hit in a given 
winter
    > > >>> is
    > > >>> by examining ducks in late summer.
    >
    > > >>> The talk also covered what you need for a rogue genemod lab to
    > > weaponize
    > > >>> pathogens: off-the-rack equipment, experienced talent, and no 
more than
    > > >>> a
    > > >>> few million dollars.  What the Russians may or may not have been 
doing
    > > >>> in
    > > >>> this regard was discussed, including a recommendation for Ken 
Alibek's
    > > >>> scary
    > > >>> book BIOHAZARD (which I have read -- it's horrifying).  Mark 
finished
    > > >>> with
    > > >>> an overview of surveillance techniques used to spot and track 
epidemics
    > > >>> so
    > > >>> that appropriate measures can be taken, including quarantine if
    > > >>> necessary.
    >
    > > >>> Thank you, Alicia.  It was terrific.
    >

    > > >>> _________________________- Hide quoted text -
    >
    > - Show quoted text -













--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to