Michael Sperber scripsit:

> However, it would be much
> better to rename named `let' to something else such as `rec', `recur'
> or `recursive'.

Or even better, "loop".

> As this would break many existing Scheme programs, the report might
> introduce the separate form, and, to ease the transition, keep named
> `let' for now, either putting it into a separate library alongside
> (r6rs mutable-pairs) or at least marking it as deprecated and likely
> to disappear in a future revision of the report.

+1

-- 
Eric Raymond is the Margaret Mead               John Cowan
of the Open Source movement.                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        --Bruce Perens,                         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
          some years ago

_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss

Reply via email to