r6rs-discuss
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Messages by Date
2014/04/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is meant by "the entire tower of subtypes"?
John Cowan
2014/04/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is meant by "the entire tower of subtypes"?
Michael Sperber
2014/04/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is meant by "the entire tower of subtypes"?
John Cowan
2014/04/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is meant by "the entire tower of subtypes"?
Michael Sperber
2014/04/21
[r6rs-discuss] What is meant by "the entire tower of subtypes"?
John Cowan
2013/07/23
[r6rs-discuss] You all don't need to do anything to change the licensing
Musical Notation
2013/07/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] "Unclear License grant", my foot.
Joe Marshall
2013/07/23
[r6rs-discuss] "Unclear License grant", my foot.
Ray Dillinger
2013/07/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
John Cowan
2013/07/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
Joe Marshall
2013/07/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
John Cowan
2013/07/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
John Cowan
2013/07/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
John David Stone
2013/07/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
John Cowan
2013/07/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
Joe Marshall
2013/07/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
Musical Notation
2013/07/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
Arthur A. Gleckler
2013/07/23
[r6rs-discuss] Unclear word in license grant
Musical Notation
2013/07/19
[r6rs-discuss] Sending evidence of permission to Wikimedia Commons
Musical Notation
2013/07/18
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Redistributing R6RS
John Cowan
2013/07/18
[r6rs-discuss] Redistributing R6RS
Musical Notation
2013/07/18
Re: [r6rs-discuss] I want to distribute the R6RS set
Musical Notation
2013/07/18
Re: [r6rs-discuss] I want to distribute the R6RS set
xacc.ide
2013/07/18
[r6rs-discuss] I want to distribute the R6RS set
Musical Notation
2013/07/18
Re: [r6rs-discuss] I want to distribute the R6RS set
Jeff Read
2013/06/05
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Procedure equivalence: the last debate
will
2013/06/05
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Procedure equivalence: the last debate
John Cowan
2013/04/18
[r6rs-discuss] ratification vote for R7RS-small
will
2013/02/06
[r6rs-discuss] 9th draft of R7RS-small released
John Cowan
2012/12/25
[r6rs-discuss] Overview of R7RS-small
John Cowan
2012/12/07
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
John Cowan
2012/12/07
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
Jim Wise
2012/09/28
[r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
John Cowan
2012/09/20
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
Alex Shinn
2012/09/20
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
will
2012/09/20
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
r6rsguy
2012/09/20
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
will
2012/09/20
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
Alex Shinn
2012/09/20
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
will
2012/09/19
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
Alex Shinn
2012/09/08
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports-wg1] Daniel Weinreb
Arthur A. Gleckler
2012/09/08
[r6rs-discuss] Daniel Weinreb
John Cowan
2012/08/15
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
Alex Shinn
2012/08/15
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
will
2012/08/15
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
Michael Sperber
2012/08/08
[r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
Alex Shinn
2012/07/18
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
2012/07/18
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
2012/07/18
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
2012/07/18
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
2012/07/17
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
2012/07/17
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
2012/07/17
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
2012/07/17
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
2012/07/17
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Andy Wingo
2012/07/17
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Alaric Snell-Pym
2012/07/17
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
2012/07/17
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Alaric Snell-Pym
2012/07/17
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Andy Wingo
2012/07/17
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Ray Dillinger
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Joe Marshall
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Ray Dillinger
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Paul Schlie
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Aaron W . Hsu
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Alan Watson
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Andy Wingo
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Aaron W . Hsu
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Ray Dillinger
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Jeff Read
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Ray Dillinger
2012/07/16
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
William D Clinger
2012/07/10
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Paul Schlie
2012/07/10
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Marijn
2012/07/08
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Paul Schlie
2012/07/08
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
2012/07/07
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Aaron W . Hsu
2012/07/07
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
2012/07/07
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Aaron W . Hsu
2012/07/07
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
2012/07/07
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
2012/06/30
[r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] Reminder: R7RS public comment period
William D Clinger
2012/05/14
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
2012/05/14
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Andy Wingo
2012/05/10
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Michael Sperber
2012/05/09
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Alan Watson
2012/05/09
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
2012/05/08
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Alan Watson
2012/05/08
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
2012/05/08
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
2012/05/08
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Alaric Snell-Pym
2012/05/08
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
leppie
2012/05/08
[r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
2012/02/15
[r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] R7RS public comment period
Marc Feeley
2011/12/31
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Macro expansion erratum
Michael Sperber
2011/10/19
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Macro expansion erratum
Andy Wingo
2011/10/18
[r6rs-discuss] Macro expansion erratum
Kristen Eisenberg
2011/07/02
Re: [r6rs-discuss] r6rs ffi
Andreas Rottmann
2011/07/02
[r6rs-discuss] r6rs ffi
Eduardo Cavazos
2011/01/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Alaric Snell-Pym
2011/01/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Peter Kourzanov
2011/01/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
2011/01/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Per Bothner
2011/01/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
David Rush
2011/01/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
David Van Horn
2011/01/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
2011/01/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
David Rush
2011/01/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
2011/01/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
John Cowan
2011/01/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
2011/01/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
David Rush
2011/01/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
2011/01/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Jim Wise
2011/01/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
2011/01/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
John Cowan
2011/01/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Jim Wise
2011/01/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
David Rush
2011/01/13
[r6rs-discuss] about r6rs-clos state
Marco Maggi
2011/01/08
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Per Bothner
2010/12/29
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] do we need to redefine eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/27
Re: [r6rs-discuss] exactness of complex parts and sqrt
Per Bothner
2010/12/27
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] case reborn
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/26
Re: [r6rs-discuss] exactness of complex parts and sqrt
John Cowan
2010/12/26
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Pied
2010/12/26
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
2010/12/26
[r6rs-discuss] exactness of complex parts and sqrt
Per Bothner
2010/12/26
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Pied
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Shiro Kawai
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Andre van Tonder
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Andre van Tonder
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Andre van Tonder
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Andre van Tonder
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Eli Barzilay
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Eli Barzilay
2010/12/24
[r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme as FP assembly language
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Pied
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
2010/12/24
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Eli Barzilay
2010/12/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Eli Barzilay
2010/12/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
2010/12/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] LAMBDA and Unicode
Shiro Kawai
2010/12/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Andre van Tonder
2010/12/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
2010/12/23
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Eli Barzilay
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Eli Barzilay
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Eli Barzilay
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Andre van Tonder
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Andre van Tonder
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Andre van Tonder
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Per Bothner
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Eli Barzilay
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Andre van Tonder
2010/12/22
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Eli Barzilay
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
r6rsguy
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Aubrey Jaffer
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
John Cowan
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Jim Wise
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Arthur A. Gleckler
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Per Bothner
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Peter Kourzanov
2010/12/21
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Jim Wise
2010/12/19
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
r6rsguy
Earlier messages