r6rs-discuss
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Messages by Thread
[r6rs-discuss] What is meant by "the entire tower of subtypes"?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is meant by "the entire tower of subtypes"?
Michael Sperber
Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is meant by "the entire tower of subtypes"?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is meant by "the entire tower of subtypes"?
Michael Sperber
Re: [r6rs-discuss] What is meant by "the entire tower of subtypes"?
John Cowan
[r6rs-discuss] "Unclear License grant", my foot.
Ray Dillinger
Re: [r6rs-discuss] "Unclear License grant", my foot.
Joe Marshall
[r6rs-discuss] You all don't need to do anything to change the licensing
Musical Notation
[r6rs-discuss] Unclear word in license grant
Musical Notation
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
Arthur A. Gleckler
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
Musical Notation
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
Joe Marshall
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
Joe Marshall
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
John David Stone
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
John Cowan
[r6rs-discuss] Sending evidence of permission to Wikimedia Commons
Musical Notation
[r6rs-discuss] Redistributing R6RS
Musical Notation
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Redistributing R6RS
John Cowan
[r6rs-discuss] I want to distribute the R6RS set
Musical Notation
Re: [r6rs-discuss] I want to distribute the R6RS set
Jeff Read
Re: [r6rs-discuss] I want to distribute the R6RS set
xacc.ide
Re: [r6rs-discuss] I want to distribute the R6RS set
Musical Notation
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Procedure equivalence: the last debate
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Procedure equivalence: the last debate
will
[r6rs-discuss] ratification vote for R7RS-small
will
[r6rs-discuss] 9th draft of R7RS-small released
John Cowan
[r6rs-discuss] Overview of R7RS-small
John Cowan
[r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
Jim Wise
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
John Cowan
[r6rs-discuss] Daniel Weinreb
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports-wg1] Daniel Weinreb
Arthur A. Gleckler
[r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
Alex Shinn
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
Michael Sperber
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
will
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
Alex Shinn
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
Alex Shinn
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
will
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
Alex Shinn
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
r6rsguy
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
will
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
Alex Shinn
Re: [r6rs-discuss] rationale for expt
will
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Paul Schlie
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Marijn
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Paul Schlie
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Paul Schlie
[r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] Reminder: R7RS public comment period
William D Clinger
[r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
leppie
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Alaric Snell-Pym
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Michael Sperber
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Alan Watson
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Alan Watson
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Andy Wingo
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Aaron W . Hsu
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Aaron W . Hsu
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
William D Clinger
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Ray Dillinger
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Jeff Read
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Ray Dillinger
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Aaron W . Hsu
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Andy Wingo
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Andy Wingo
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Alan Watson
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Aaron W . Hsu
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Ray Dillinger
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Joe Marshall
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Ray Dillinger
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Alaric Snell-Pym
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Alaric Snell-Pym
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
Andy Wingo
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
will
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Why is (eqv? g g) unspecified when g is a procedure?
John Cowan
[r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] R7RS public comment period
Marc Feeley
[r6rs-discuss] Macro expansion erratum
Kristen Eisenberg
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Macro expansion erratum
Andy Wingo
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Macro expansion erratum
Michael Sperber
[r6rs-discuss] r6rs ffi
Eduardo Cavazos
Re: [r6rs-discuss] r6rs ffi
Andreas Rottmann
[r6rs-discuss] about r6rs-clos state
Marco Maggi
[r6rs-discuss] exactness of complex parts and sqrt
Per Bothner
Re: [r6rs-discuss] exactness of complex parts and sqrt
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] exactness of complex parts and sqrt
Per Bothner
Re: [r6rs-discuss] match.scm
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] match.scm
Jim Wise
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] match.scm
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] match.scm
John Cowan
[r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Per Bothner
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Per Bothner
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Per Bothner
[r6rs-discuss] LAMBDA and Unicode (Was: Scheme pattern matching & R*RS)
Shiro Kawai
Re: [r6rs-discuss] LAMBDA and Unicode (Was: Scheme pattern matching & R*RS)
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] LAMBDA and Unicode
Shiro Kawai
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Pied
Re: [r6rs-discuss] freshmen & unicode lambda's
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] need to overload (case) for pattern-matching
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Per Bothner
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Per Bothner
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
David Rush
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Jim Wise
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Jim Wise
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
David Rush
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
David Rush
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
David Van Horn
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Per Bothner
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
David Rush
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Alaric Snell-Pym
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Jim Wise
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Jim Wise
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Eli Barzilay
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Eli Barzilay
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Eli Barzilay
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Pied
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Eli Barzilay
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Pied
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Pied
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] case reborn
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] do we need to redefine eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Eli Barzilay
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Shiro Kawai
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Eli Barzilay
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Eli Barzilay
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Eli Barzilay
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Aubrey Jaffer
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Andre van Tonder
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Per Bothner
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Arthur A. Gleckler
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
John Cowan
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
John Cowan
Earlier messages