"Carl Eastlund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> For reference, PLT Scheme has a "recur" form (in the "etc.ss" library)
> for those who do not like named let.  Other than the name, it has
> precisely the same syntax and behavior as named let.  There is no need
> to lose anything in the transition.  I don't think anyone is trying to
> take anything away, just to change names.

Exactly.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss

Reply via email to