On Fri, 25 May 2007, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Jay Sulzberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, 25 May 2007, Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > R6 should be completely different from the current draft, >> > in my opinion. >> > >> > The addition of a few, parsimoniously chosen features >> > eliminates the need for almost everything that is new >> > in the R6 draft. Nearly *ALL* of the new hacks could >> > be done as SRFIs, if only R6 would add these few OPTIONAL >> > features: >> >> Yes. Let us keep Scheme Scheme. > > In which version of the Scheme report did first class environments > appear? Fexprs? > > -- > sam th > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I address no specifics. But I believe that R6RS so far is not sufficiently exact, nor sufficiently minimal. I also recognize that I am a spectator, and not a worker. oo--JS. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
