AndrevanTonder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, AndrevanTonder wrote:
>>>> If multiple returns occur from ---, the return values >>>> returned by earlier returns are not mutated. > > By the way, I think the same requirement should be imposed on > > list-sort > vector-sort > > in (rnrs sorting). Also, I think it would be sensible to require the same > of > > vector-map > > in (r6rs base). For `list-sort', OK. But for `vector-sort' and `vector-map'? Maybe I'm not understanding the issue correctly: You had a great example for why allowing mutation would be harmful with `map'---moreover, there isn't really any overhead with `map'. But is the same the case for the procedures operating on vectors? -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
