On 28 Oct 2009, at 6:22 am, Brian Harvey wrote: > For me, the paradigmatic issue is that the R6 people view the Lisp > REPL as > an unnecessary frill -- well, let me not put opinions in other > people's > brains and merely remark that they produced a document that makes > proper > REPL support impossible.
I was pleased to note the following: "A semantics compatible with interactive read/eval/print loops should be provided." in http://www.scheme-reports.org/2009/working-group-1-charter.html, which I hope implies making one language semantics, and that being REPL-compatible :-) ABS -- Alaric Snell-Pym Work: http://www.snell-systems.co.uk/ Play: http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ Blog: http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/archives/author/alaric/ _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
