On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 15:36 +0000, David Rush wrote:
> Now it is interesting to note that hygienic macros float the syntactic
> extension functionality outside of the entire EVAL/APPLY loop and into
> a conceptually separate pass. This makes environmental manipulations
> completely impossible to the macro processor. But my question (and
> challenge) is there a semantically sound way to model macros that
> returns them to their place inside EVAL?
I think that the fully consistent or 'semantically sound'
way to model macros puts them fully in the domain of EVAL
instead.
Bear
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
