On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 18:27 -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> This is Scheme, not C.
>
>
> The time functions should return a NUMBER. I'm disgusted (sorry) with
> the retreat from Scheme's excellent numeric system. Implementations
> can return whichever format number suits them best. Let the interface
> declare the accuracy of the returned value as well--as a number.
While I agree with you in principle, I cannot imagine any use for
complex numbers in the time interface. I think that the time
interface can be complete and consistent with REAL numbers.
Bear
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
