Peter Kourzanov scripsit:

> Hence my question: what is the state of pattern matching in Scheme? Are
> there ideas to move this forward, or are we, the poor users, left to
> live with incompatible pattern matching interfaces and implementations?

Working Group 2 has decided that an optional pattern matching module
will be part of R7RS.

> Just to mention a few: Bigloo's match-case, PLT/Racket match.ss variants
> and many more.

If you care to do some work preparing one or more proposals either based
on these, or on something else, or on suitable combinations of them,
you will get much love from the WG.  Just send it to me, and I will
post it for WG2's consideration.

-- 
He played King Lear as though           John Cowan <co...@ccil.org>
someone had played the ace.             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --Eugene Field

_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss

Reply via email to