On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 00:28 -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> > The main problem I still have is that the calendrical time is a real
> > number[1], while the sub-second, physical time is an integer. I
> > think this is exactly backward. I apologize for my previous
> > proposal, which had integer physical time, it only distracted
> > from the important thing.
> > In order to avoid anomalous behaviour, the calendar time must be in
> > integer seconds.
> On reflection I agree, and the current version (version 17) of
> TimeCowan now makes (current-posix-second) an integer. I have updated
> TimeAdvancedCowan to version 15 to reflect this change.
I do not understand why this is so. Can you explain it for me?
Bear
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
