Per Bothner scripsit: > "Problem" is a strange word in this context - that eqv? was defined > as equal? is irrelevant to what is happening (at least for Kawa). > The reason the result is #t is that (as you mention elsewhere): > implementations are free to make literal strings eqv? if they have > the same content.
Oops, I forgot to control for that. The jury will disregard what I said. -- Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN John Cowan in any language. --Ed Post co...@ccil.org _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
