And now comes a question from a user who reads all your debates in awe, but can't help thinking there's a lot of hair splitting involved.
"Why not just parameterize CASE or whatever pattern-matcher with an equivalence predicate?" Wouldn't this solve many problems we read here? Would it create enough others problems to be disqualified? I believe that (case-with my-equality-predicate foo ((bar) quux) (else rofl))) (I hope my intervention is not too off topic…) Cheers. -- Français, English, 日本語, 한국어 _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
