> Can someone explain the thinking of the R6RS committee here? I could never understand that either.
How will inlining and beta-reduction apply if the procedure is not applied, and simply being a reference to something? The closest notion I can see is that, for some reason, the code could possibly be transformed into: (eqv? (lambda (x) (+ x 1)) (lambda (x) (+ x 1))) which IMO, is a wasted optimization in the case where the procedure is not applied. My 2 cents leppie -- http://codeplex.com/IronScheme http://xacc.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
