Why are you so eager to find an interpretation of the text that prohibits the very distribution you claim you want to do? On Jul 23, 2013 7:49 AM, "John Cowan" <co...@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Musical Notation scripsit: > > > What sentence? You didn't include it in the reply. (Is it free to > > distribute commercially?) > > Why are you so eager to commercially distribute something you have > obviously not read? > > -- > Let's face it: software is crap. Feature-laden and bloated, written under > tremendous time-pressure, often by incapable coders, using dangerous > languages and inadequate tools, trying to connect to heaps of broken or > obsolete protocols, implemented equally insufficiently, running on > unpredictable hardware -- we are all more than used to brokenness. > --Felix Winkelmann > > _______________________________________________ > r6rs-discuss mailing list > r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org > http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss >
_______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
