> That makes sense in retrospect. Adding an extra scope makes > `syntax-original?` produce #f for everything in whole module, and that > makes DrRacket ignore the identifiers. > > I think `make-syntax-introducer` should probably accept an optional > argument to specify that the new scope should *not* indicate > non-original syntax.
I’m returning to this problem now, so may I ask if you’ve given any more thought to this issue? If that’s the right approach, how hard would it be to implement that change for `make-syntax-introducer`? Is the usage of `'original-for-check-syntax` relevant here (I don’t think there was a clear consensus reached)? Alexis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/3F280188-3684-4B50-BE24-0AC1F6BFFD8C%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
