Oh wow, thanks for the prompt update. I was in the process of trying to pick my way through the C code to figure out how I might be able to implement it myself, but I must admit I wasn’t getting anywhere fast. ;)
> On Jul 25, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, those uses rely on the resulting syntax not being `syntax-original?`. > > I've pushed the change to `make-syntax-introducer`. Pass a true > argument to `make-syntax-introducer` to create a scope that acts like a > use-site scope (no effect on `syntax-original?`) instead of a > macro-introduction scope. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/A060592B-B0C8-4644-BCAB-75E3822B9AB1%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
