I think the change to `make-syntax-introducer` is straightforward, and it still seems like the right idea, but I haven't gotten there, yet. (I hope to catch up on many things next week.)
At Fri, 24 Jul 2015 22:32:55 -0700, Alexis King wrote: > > That makes sense in retrospect. Adding an extra scope makes > > `syntax-original?` produce #f for everything in whole module, and that > > makes DrRacket ignore the identifiers. > > > > I think `make-syntax-introducer` should probably accept an optional > > argument to specify that the new scope should *not* indicate > > non-original syntax. > > I’m returning to this problem now, so may I ask if you’ve given any more > thought to this issue? If that’s the right approach, how hard would it be to > implement that change for `make-syntax-introducer`? Is the usage of > `'original-for-check-syntax` relevant here (I don’t think there was a clear > consensus reached)? > > Alexis > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/3F280188-3684-4B50-BE24-0AC1F6BFFD > 8C%40gmail.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/20150725130343.28B776501D1%40mail-svr1.cs.utah.edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
