> You may notice that I only mention define-syntax-rule and
> syntax-parse. That was on purpose.

Aha. Nice.

> I read this as a suggestion that I
> should replace define-syntax-rule with define-simple-macro.

Yes, after expanding my ramble to actionable primitives, that is
really all that remains. :)

Thanks again!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAGspUn12Grfk%2BjV6iOcgDALOVoT_b%2BMDUOJ7bdcdAz%2Bnpm4zsg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to