What's wrong with define-simple-macro ? I think it's clearer about what it does than define-syntax-rule.
> On Oct 7, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree. I don't like the name. I think define-syntax-rule is a choice > choice name. > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Jack Firth <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 5:26:48 PM UTC-7, jay.mccarthy wrote: >>> >>> You may notice that I only mention define-syntax-rule and >>> syntax-parse. That was on purpose. I read this as a suggestion that I >>> should replace define-syntax-rule with define-simple-macro. >> >> >> On that topic, are there any opinions on changing the name from >> `define-simple-macro` to something else? It's always struck me as odd. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/35B70672-C710-43E1-8126-87F9D8ECCD54%40knauth.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
