(Re: changing the name of define-simple-macro) On 10/07/2015 02:34 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
define-syntax-parse define-rule define-rewrite
What about just calling it define-syntax-rule? How many things would actually break? If syntax-parse is The Way To Write Macros, shouldn't the simple single-rule macro-defining syntax in #lang racket reflect that? The same thing could probably be said for syntax-rules as well.
-- Brian Mastenbrook [email protected] https://brian.mastenbrook.net/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/5615D1E3.7030402%40mastenbrook.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
