It's fine for me. Gustavo
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Vincent St-Amour <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 07:59:30 -0500, > Gustavo Massaccesi wrote: >> >> > 397d6041823497a639c09660eca2f0573a58c62e >> > 8bb79deaa21ebbaba544ec29c6702369a3b23035 >> > f8b3ba8253b2b94e5f0b060bc256f651ba73dd48 >> >> Are too minor or too internal. >> >> > d4158c2b04b71d193ab32e43396b62b865ec2df6 >> > dce42313ad3dea250acd1de4c56161b3fd87eca1 >> > e5e781c4ecffe5494d662e1a43ba3a5dcc2db887 >> >> * The Racket optimizer detects more optimization opportunities, >> including procedures that operate on lists, strings and byte strings. >> >> This is not an exact description, but it's close enough. >> Perhaps it should be redacted to be more similar to the bullet written >> by Mathew ("Optimizations in the bytecode compiler ...") because the >> changes are in the same step of the compilation. > > How about combining the two bullets? > > * Optimizations in the bytecode compiler improve performance for > structure, list, string, and byte-string operations. > > Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAPaha9NZyF9wSNFv%3Da%2B08r1k77DPKStdTaikB0n27cxAp3Ueqw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
