It's fine for me.
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Vincent St-Amour
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 07:59:30 -0500,
> Gustavo Massaccesi wrote:
>> > 397d6041823497a639c09660eca2f0573a58c62e
>> > 8bb79deaa21ebbaba544ec29c6702369a3b23035
>> > f8b3ba8253b2b94e5f0b060bc256f651ba73dd48
>> Are too minor or too internal.
>> > d4158c2b04b71d193ab32e43396b62b865ec2df6
>> > dce42313ad3dea250acd1de4c56161b3fd87eca1
>> > e5e781c4ecffe5494d662e1a43ba3a5dcc2db887
>> * The Racket optimizer detects more optimization opportunities,
>> including procedures that operate on lists, strings and byte strings.
>> This is not an exact description, but it's close enough.
>> Perhaps it should be redacted to be more similar to the bullet written
>> by Mathew ("Optimizations in the bytecode compiler ...") because the
>> changes are in the same step of the compilation.
> How about combining the two bullets?
> * Optimizations in the bytecode compiler improve performance for
> structure, list, string, and byte-string operations.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.