On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> A third view is that the `compiled` subdir should be open to all who want >> to use it, but that there should be a convention of each package making a >> subdirectory therein, so that the `racket` caches don't mess with `pollen` >> caches and vice versa and so on (which would be more of a social convention >> than technical convention) > > This sounds like a good direction. Maybe a convention could be based on > file extensions and/or subdirectories, since tools like `raco make` and > `raco setup` will write only ".zo" and ".dep" files.
Using ring-0 pkg names as the names of those directories sounds right to me. (DrRacket already uses this convention (but I think its use predates pkgs).) Robby -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to racket-dev@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAL3TdOOg1QqbKw31Mksc8C13V8PwSd_oHjVHZj%3D2ELAzHmEvuw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
