On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: >> Scheme provides [...], but little in the way of library support. > > For the record, I think that line is a bit dated. It's a good line for > hustling the CL people in the audience, though. :)
In terms of support strictly for *functional* programming, I think it's true. Racket is better in this area, but I don't think we're there yet. We've got lists, which we all know and love, and now hashes and sets. That's about it in terms of functional data structures, which is part of why Hari and I have worked on this project - hopefully it will result in a bunch more in the core. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
