On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > Well, I agree that the sentence is misleading. It is not at all clear > (at least to this reader) that the second half of the sentence was > restricting itself to a narrow definition of libraries.
Remember, the subject of the sentence is Scheme, not Racket. Racket is a lot better in this regard; for example, lists are immutable. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
