On 24/02/13 15:41, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
Another benefit is that it generates this page:
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Reports:Tasks_not_implemented_in_Racket
Note that some of the pages listed there actually do have Racket
solutions, but they may be listed in the Scheme section ATM.
Do tasks that are implemented in Scheme, but marked with:
{{works for|Racket}} count against "Tasks_not_implemented_in_Racket".
If that is so, is there any reason to implement a task in Racket that is
suitably implemented in Scheme? Maybe then sweep up behind the
"Implemented in Scheme but works for Racket" to see if there's a more
Rackety way of doing it.
Tim Brown
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users