Sounds great! And then we add "does not work for Scheme or Lisp." :-)
On Feb 25, 2013, at 5:07 AM, Tim Brown wrote: > On 24/02/13 15:41, Asumu Takikawa wrote: >> Another benefit is that it generates this page: >> http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Reports:Tasks_not_implemented_in_Racket >> >> Note that some of the pages listed there actually do have Racket >> solutions, but they may be listed in the Scheme section ATM. > > Do tasks that are implemented in Scheme, but marked with: > {{works for|Racket}} count against "Tasks_not_implemented_in_Racket". > > If that is so, is there any reason to implement a task in Racket that is > suitably implemented in Scheme? Maybe then sweep up behind the > "Implemented in Scheme but works for Racket" to see if there's a more > Rackety way of doing it. > > Tim Brown ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
