Oh my goodness, it is real. I was really thinking that if i truly tried to generate such a paper, probably they would not notice.
On Feb 26, 2017 02:01, "Matthew Butterick" <m...@mbtype.com> wrote: > > On Feb 25, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Linh Chi Nguyen <nguyenlinhch...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > anyway, when being asked to say-something, the machine generates quite > good sentences. i have this secret hope [0] that if i feed it enough game > theory literature, somehow it can generate something of value for my phd > thesis =)) because i'm so stuck. > > > > The champion in this category is SCIgen [1], which AFAIK has not been > ported to Racket. [2] > > > [1] https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/archive/scigen/ > > [2] https://github.com/strib/scigen > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
