Thanks for pointing me to ELIZA. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA
It's interesting. ^^ i dont doubt that people would develop sentiments toward a chatbot that just simply speak random. Not to say that, if i'm the one that makes the program, i would have affection toward it also. It's a puzzling emotion. But we have it, so. Also, it can be irrational, but if it helps in psychological treatment, then it helps. It's just that these methods (placebo, nocebo, hynotise, telepathy..) are in the minority (such as some surreal deviations of born autistic individuals). So it wont work on the majority. On Mar 1, 2017 10:24, "Nguyen Linh Chi" <nguyenlinhch...@gmail.com> wrote: Sorry but can i just ask this question, because this is out of my thinking capacity (i have very little knowledge of computer stuff) The program of lab 7 is to generate pseudo-natural sentences. It's not interactive in the sense that i cannot talk to it. I can only tell it to say-something and it says something based on its data history. I was wondering, in which way i can make a program that response to what i say. like a chatbot. what is the simplest version of a chat bot. should i give it conversations, telling which sentence is the initiator, which is the responder? then storing the sentences by breaking them down using the same structure as a writing style (so a sentence is the smallest unit of a writing style). when i say something, the program will try to comprehend my sentence by comparing it with its database. if it finds a roughly similar sentence, it get the responder sentence to respond to me. i dont know. just asking, if anyone has any idea or simple solution for beginner? On Feb 26, 2017 21:47, "Nguyen Linh Chi" <nguyenlinhch...@gmail.com> wrote: Oh my goodness, it is real. I was really thinking that if i truly tried to generate such a paper, probably they would not notice. On Feb 26, 2017 02:01, "Matthew Butterick" <m...@mbtype.com> wrote: > > On Feb 25, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Linh Chi Nguyen <nguyenlinhch...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > anyway, when being asked to say-something, the machine generates quite > good sentences. i have this secret hope [0] that if i feed it enough game > theory literature, somehow it can generate something of value for my phd > thesis =)) because i'm so stuck. > > > > The champion in this category is SCIgen [1], which AFAIK has not been > ported to Racket. [2] > > > [1] https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/archive/scigen/ > > [2] https://github.com/strib/scigen > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
