On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Daniel Prager
<daniel.a.pra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Philip McGrath <phi...@philipmcgrath.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I think that would be because "the draw is called during the dynamic
>> extent of the call to dc as part of the contract checking."
>
>
>  That explains it!
>
> I think I can take the performance hit — it would be nice to have
> fine-grained control of contract-checking for these expensive checks,
> though.

I've added unsafe-dc that skips the pre-condition check.

Robby

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to