On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Vishesh Yadav <vishes...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> BTW: I'm interested in porting to RacketScript. How does the performance
>> of the image library equivalent compare with regular Racket?
> It is slower than regular Racket. I did not spend much time comparing it
> with Racket, and there is definitively scope for improvement. Let us know
> how porting goes.
Thanks: it's on my list.
I may try to do some reduced-case benchmarks for a few approaches in
Racket, and for RacketScript.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.