George Neuner <> writes:

> Hi Cam,
> On 10/10/2018 5:03 PM, Cam wrote:
>> I took a packet capture and the only interesting thing I was able to
>> find in it was a conversation like this:
>> localmachine->remotemachine:
>> > #s(dcgm 11 -1 -1 "")#s(dcgm 9 -1 (dynamic-place 
>> > #"/home/cam/tmp/racket-distributed-places-test/my-worker.rkt" main) 1
>> remotemachine->localmachine:
>> > #s(dcgm 7 -1 -1 1)
>> ... and that seems to be the end of the conversation.
>>     :
>> If I'm reading this right, all it really tells us is that localmachine
>> asked remotemachine to create a new place, and then remotemachine wrote
>> back that it died(?).
>   Yes.
>> Does any of this make sense to anyone else? The code in distributed.rkt
>> is a little above my level, though I suppose I'll find myself elbow-deep
>> in it pretty soon unless somebody else has a hot tip :).
> It seems like the remote machine is failing to load the local file 
> "/home/cam/tmp/racket-distributed-places-test/my-worker.rkt".  Is that 
> file available?
> George

That was it! I knew I was missing something obvious. For some reason, I
had the impression (not at all backed up by any of the documentation, in
retrospect) that the code would be automatically transmitted over
the network to the remote node.

Thanks, George.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
For more options, visit

Reply via email to