On 05/11/2018 15:57, Matt Jadud wrote:
> Hi all,
> First, thank you for the conversation around this. 
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 5:30 PM George Neuner <gneun...@comcast.net
> <mailto:gneun...@comcast.net>> wrote:
>     One .zo per distributed place is just one descriptor per process. 
>     Again insignificant because you have 4K per process.
>     It's apparent that the code is leaking descriptors somewhere. 
>     Forcing GC may mitigate the problem, but it would be better if you
>     found the leak.
> I've lied. I am *not* using distributed places. I'm using
> *dynamic-place*, which clearly is why I'm running into limits.
> Unless anyone has alternative ideas, I'm going to restructure my code to
> use distributed places on the single machine, which will, I think, give
> me multicore parallelism and eliminate the file descriptor limit I'm
> running up against. 

I have developed loci which has the same interface as places but uses
processes instead of OS threads.


The documentation is non-existent but if you know places, there should
be little else to do besides replacing place for locus and places for
loci. Let me know if I can help any further.

Paulo Matos

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to