> On Jan 26, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Hendrik Boom <hend...@topoi.pooq.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 07:50:56PM -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >> >> Yes. See Clojure history. — Matthias > > Given the amount of text you have quoted, it's not clear what you are > saying yes to. Hickey: "we tweak Perlis one final time - "It is best to have 100 functions operate on NO data structure”.” [[ He means to have 100 transducers on Interfaces, instead of 10 x 10 functions on concrete data structures. ]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
- Re: [racket-users] Collections and data struc... Greg Hendershott
- Re: [racket-users] Collections and data s... Gustavo Massaccesi
- Re: [racket-users] Collections and da... David Storrs
- Re: [racket-users] Collections and da... Matthias Felleisen
- Re: [racket-users] Collections an... Jack Firth
- Re: [racket-users] Collectio... Thomas F. Burdick
- Re: [racket-users] Colle... Matthias Felleisen
- Re: [racket-users] Colle... Jack Firth
- Re: [racket-users] Colle... Matthias Felleisen
- Re: [racket-users] Colle... Hendrik Boom
- Re: [racket-users] Colle... Matthias Felleisen
- Re: [racket-users] Colle... Sorawee Porncharoenwase
- Re: [racket-users] Colle... Matthias Felleisen
- Re: [racket-users] Colle... Hendrik Boom
- Re: [racket-users] Colle... Jesse Alama
- Re: [racket-users] Collectio... Hendrik Boom
- Re: [racket-users] Collections and data structures... Jack Rosenthal
- Re: [racket-users] Collections and data structures... Stephen De Gabrielle