> > This is nice for defining abstract types, but it can be pretty >> inconvenient for defining plain old aggregated data types that just have a >> bundle of fields. When defining those types as structs, consider using the >> #:transparent option. This means "use no inspector at all" (roughly) and >> lets `struct-info` Just Work (TM) without any inspector wrangling. The >> downside is that other modules may be able to break your type's invariants >> and possibly circumvent your contracts. > > > That's what I expected, but it doesn't seem to work: > > > (struct person (name age) #:transparent) > > (struct-info person) > #f > #t > > What am I missing? >
I was stumped on this for a while, but then realized the problem: > (struct-info person) #f #t > (struct-info (person "Alyssa P. Hacker" 42)) #<struct-type:person> #f -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
