Hi Sig,

GNU provides they reason why not to use LGPL: 

Location licence in racket repository: 

- Github has a summary of what they think the meaning of LGPL is 

GNU also provides this; https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-java.html which I 
*believe* mirrors what is written at 
I hope this helps. 

Kind regards, 


On Friday, August 23, 2019 at 10:25:02 PM UTC+9, sage wrote:
> --I believe this email was lost due to me not being subscribed to the list 
> last time I sent it. Sorry if this is a duplicate.
> Has someone tried to release an *open source* Racket project under a 
> license that enforces paid commercial use of that project? Light Googling 
> suggests this would be antithetical to the LGPL if not open source in 
> general, but https://download.racket-lang.org/license.html says "the 
> Racket license does not restrict you at all."
> I understand no replies here or any web page constitutes legal advice, so 
> please take my question in the spirit of respecting the LGPL's sublicensing 
> restrictions and learning what other people are doing to earn money 
> independently using Racket.
> *~slg*

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to