Regarding the discussion of tests expected to fail, and moving
expected-fail tests to different directories, I wonder whether you'd
prefer using an expected-fail annotation per test case.
An annotation seems useful for my own work, and lightweight, but I don't
know about core Racket (especially with the couple decades of legacy
tests done various ways).
https://www.neilvandyke.org/racket/overeasy/#%28part._.Expected_.Failures%29
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/a16626c5-72c5-17ea-fdee-b84583cd6d0e%40neilvandyke.org.
