Hmm... I don't see a new message in the thread, so I'm not sure what you 
approved. No worries though.

On Friday, February 14, 2020 at 7:36:26 AM UTC-5, Robby Findler wrote:
>
> It is possible that your post wasn't deleted but got held up in 
> google's spam traps. I just approved a message from you (that I was 
> alerted to only this morning). Was that the message? 
>
> Robby 
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 2:57 PM Brian Adkins <br...@lojic.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > 
> > I tried replying earlier today, but somehow the post got deleted - 
> could've been user error I suppose. 
> > 
> > Anyway, the gist of the response was how I continue to be amazed by how 
> often I get pleasant surprises with Racket - either there is some facility 
> to do what I want that I just haven't found yet, or in this case where 
> there soon will be :) 
> > 
> > I have a couple Racket web apps in production now, so I think I have 
> enough real world examples to begin extracting code into a web framework. 
> Although it will look significantly different than Rails (more functional, 
> less object oriented), I'm hoping to achieve similar ease-of-use 
> functionality. I first viewed the Rails "weblog in 15 minutes" video 
> fourteen years ago, and it had a significant impact on my professional life 
> (at the time I was working in Java w/ Spring & Hibernate, etc.). The video 
> is dated now & has some annoying idiosyncrasies, but if you haven't seen 
> it, and you're interested in web development (in any language), it's worth 
> viewing just to get the overview of Rails ease of use: 
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gzj723LkRJY&feature=youtu.be 
> > 
> > On Thursday, February 13, 2020 at 11:02:33 AM UTC-5, bogdan wrote: 
> >> 
> >> The version of the web-server that will be included with Racket 7.6 
> >> changes the way file uploads are handled so that they get offloaded to 
> >> disk after a certain threshold (similar to how that nginx module you 
> >> linked to works). 
> >> 
> >> You can check out the pre-release docs for details: 
> >> 
> >> * 
> https://pre-release.racket-lang.org/doc/web-server/http.html?q=binding%3Afile#%28def._%28%28lib._web-server%2Fhttp%2Frequest-structs..rkt%29._make-binding~3afile%2Fport%29%29
>  
> >> * 
> https://pre-release.racket-lang.org/doc/web-server-internal/dispatch-server-unit.html#%28part._safety-limits%29
>  
> >> 
> >> To get these changes ahead of the release, you should be able to 
> install 
> >> an updated version of `web-server-lib' from the package server or from 
> git. 
> >> 
> >> Hope that helps! 
> >> 
> >> - Bogdan 
> >> 
> >> Brian Adkins writes: 
> >> 
> >> > I'm posting a file to my web app using the following form: 
> >> > 
> >> > <form accept-charset="UTF-8" action="@(url-for 'upload-contacts 
> >> > (organization-id org-obj))" 
> >> >       method="post" *enctype="multipart/form-data"* 
> >> > class="file-upload-form"> 
> >> > ... 
> >> > </form> 
> >> > 
> >> > I use a simple function to create a hashtable of attributes: 
> >> > 
> >> > (define (form-values req) 
> >> >   (for/hash ([ b (in-list (request-bindings/raw req)) ]) 
> >> >     (cond [ (binding:form? b) (values 
> >> >                                (bytes->string/utf-8 (binding-id b) 
> #\space) 
> >> >                                (bytes->string/utf-8 
> (binding:form-value b) 
> >> > #\space)) ] 
> >> >           [ (binding:file? b) (values 
> >> >                                (bytes->string/utf-8 (binding-id b) 
> #\space) 
> >> >                                (binding:file-content b)) ]))) 
> >> > 
> >> > It appears that the entire file contents are in the binding by the 
> time the 
> >> > request is available to me. This is fine for "small enough" files, 
> but for 
> >> > larger files, it would be great to be able to stream the file 
> contents. The 
> >> > solution may be to use something like nginx's upload module: 
> >> > 
> >> > https://www.nginx.com/resources/wiki/modules/upload/ 
> >> > 
> >> > But before I go down that route, I thought I'd ask if the Racket web 
> server 
> >> > provides a more direct way to accomplish this. 
> >> > 
> >> > Thanks, 
> >> > Brian 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "Racket Users" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to racket...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. 
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/6a3298ff-a40c-4a6e-9f16-b1c95144e482%40googlegroups.com.
>  
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/278f757e-1965-4298-a3e1-6483f06e7d14%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to