On Sat, 3 Sept 2022 at 19:10, Shu-Hung You <shh...@u.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> Running `racket foo.asm` will produce the desired output, so a shell > script that directly passes the arguments to Racket could work. > Otherwise, just use (dynamic-require filename #f) in main.rkt. > Thanks for helping! Don't both of these methods require a #lang line in the input file? That's not part of the assembly format, so I want to be able to specify the language in the main module. Indeed, when I try it with a file with a #lang line, dynamic-require works; when I remove that line, I get an error about a missing module declaration (no surprise). I can see an obvious workaround, namely to slurp the file and prepend a module declaration before dynamic-requiring it, but that's ugly. So it seems that in fact what I want is to call something like dynamic-require with a module object. But I'm not sure what to call or how to get one of those: read-syntax returns a syntax object, not a module, while I don't (yet) know how to apply my expander's #%module-begin to it to obtain a module. At the technical level, foo.asm is in fact an ordinary Racket module, > just like any other .rkt file. Therefore it can be run in the same way > using APIs that require and instantiate modules. > Right! That's what I've obviously not fully understood yet. (Thanks for the side node about moving to Discourse—it's a while since I've been active on the list!) -- https://rrt.sc3d.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAOnWdojngwzQRGz0dj1QpA4OJixOKGMXGLrepdae08D8dhpJfQ%40mail.gmail.com.
