Hi Jim,

Thanks for the response. I am currently using Radiant (0.9.1) which I was
under the impression was Rails 3 compliant. I may have misread that. Thanks
for the pointers to other version of AWS, I will give them a shot.

Thanks again,
Bobby

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Jim Gay <j...@saturnflyer.com> wrote:

> I'm not very familiar with ActionWebService, but you could check other
> forks for support of rails 3
> http://github.com/datanoise/actionwebservice/network
>
> Are you running the rails 3 branch of radiant? Because we bundle rails
> 2.3.8 with the current gem (0.9.1)
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Bobby Johnson <bobby.john...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Ok, so I have dug in a bit more and it looks like ActionWebServive was
> > replaced with ActionResource which is intended to provide RESTful
> interfaces
> > of your ActiveRecord entities. Not sure how to make ActionResource
> conform
> > to the metablogapi xmlrpc api. But I am digging more. Are there any good
> > docs on testing extensions for Radiant?
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Bobby Johnson (NotMyself)
> > <bobby.john...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi gang,
> >>
> >> I am attempting to convert my blog over to radiantcms & rails 3. I am
> >> getting the following error when trying to hit api/xmlrpc:
> >> http://gist.github.com/579241
> >>
> >> Now, I have researched myself enough to know that I am running radiant
> >> with rails 3 and feed_me has a dependency on actionwebservice which
> >> doesn't seem to support rails 3. The extension is simple enough and I
> >> want to try to fix it myself. Maybe even make a contribution back to
> >> the community.
> >>
> >> My question is what is the rails 3 way of standing up a web service? I
> >> can't seem to find any documentation on it and my google-fu is failing
> >> me.
> >>
> >> Thanks for any pointers in the right direction, even if it's a "go
> >> read this" kinda response.
> >>
> >> Bobby
> >
> >
> > --
> > "The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be
> > correct."
> >
> > - Occam’s Razor
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jim Gay
> Saturn Flyer LLC
> http://www.saturnflyer.com
> 571-403-0338
>



-- 
"The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be
correct."

- Occam’s Razor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor

Reply via email to