Had you any luck with extension ? I'd like to use it and doesn't really want to dive into that right now... Regards
On Sep 27, 3:56 pm, Bobby Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Thanks for the response. I am currently using Radiant (0.9.1) which I was > under the impression was Rails 3 compliant. I may have misread that. Thanks > for the pointers to other version of AWS, I will give them a shot. > > Thanks again, > Bobby > > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Jim Gay <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not very familiar with ActionWebService, but you could check other > > forks for support of rails 3 > >http://github.com/datanoise/actionwebservice/network > > > Are you running the rails 3 branch of radiant? Because we bundle rails > > 2.3.8 with the current gem (0.9.1) > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Bobby Johnson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Ok, so I have dug in a bit more and it looks like ActionWebServive was > > > replaced with ActionResource which is intended to provide RESTful > > interfaces > > > of your ActiveRecord entities. Not sure how to make ActionResource > > conform > > > to the metablogapi xmlrpc api. But I am digging more. Are there any good > > > docs on testing extensions for Radiant? > > > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Bobby Johnson (NotMyself) > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi gang, > > > >> I am attempting to convert my blog over to radiantcms & rails 3. I am > > >> getting the following error when trying to hit api/xmlrpc: > > >>http://gist.github.com/579241 > > > >> Now, I have researched myself enough to know that I am running radiant > > >> with rails 3 and feed_me has a dependency on actionwebservice which > > >> doesn't seem to support rails 3. The extension is simple enough and I > > >> want to try to fix it myself. Maybe even make a contribution back to > > >> the community. > > > >> My question is what is the rails 3 way of standing up a web service? I > > >> can't seem to find any documentation on it and my google-fu is failing > > >> me. > > > >> Thanks for any pointers in the right direction, even if it's a "go > > >> read this" kinda response. > > > >> Bobby > > > > -- > > > "The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be > > > correct." > > > > - Occam’s Razor > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor> > > > -- > > Jim Gay > > Saturn Flyer LLC > >http://www.saturnflyer.com > > 571-403-0338 > > -- > "The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be > correct." > > - Occam’s Razorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor
